{"id":706,"date":"2026-03-27T10:49:46","date_gmt":"2026-03-27T09:49:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/?p=706"},"modified":"2026-03-27T10:49:46","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T09:49:46","slug":"beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Court of Justice of the European Union, 18 December 2025\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Is personalizing components of pre-existing models sufficient to obtain &#8220;Community design&#8221; protection under Regulation (EC) No. 6\/2002, or is it necessary to demonstrate a creative contribution of the designer? With its recent judgment in Case C-323\/24, the Court of Justice of the European Union has provided definitive clarity on this point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">The company <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Deity Shoes<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\"> had registered designs for footwear created by personalizing components (colors, buckles) of pre-existing models from suppliers&#8217; catalogs according to predetermined lists. Competitors <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Mundorama Confort<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\"> and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Stay Design<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\"> challenged the validity of these registered designs, arguing that the mere combination of pre-existing elements did not represent a genuine \u201ccreative effort\u201d worthy of protection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">The Court of Justice ruled that no creative activity is required from the author of a design for it to be protected under the aforementioned Regulation. Unlike copyright law, design protection relies exclusively on two objective requirements: novelty and individual character.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Therefore, combining predetermined features from a catalog does not prevent the recognition of individual character. The decisive factor is that the overall impression produced on the so-called &#8220;informed user&#8221; must be different from that produced by any pre-existing model.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Furthermore, regarding fashion trends, the European judges ruled out that current &#8220;trends&#8221; do not constitute a limitation on the author&#8217;s freedom, such that small differences between several models may be sufficient to generate a different overall impression.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\"> Nor<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\"> could fashion trends influence the informed user making him less attentive to elements common to that \u201ctrend\u201d; according to the Court, these trends may impact the consumer\u2019s aesthetic perception or the product\u2019s commercial success, but not the overall impression the design produces on the informed user.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">This decision appears to mark a clear departure from Italian case law (see, e.g., Court of Milan, May 15, 2018 and Court of Genoa, July 18, 2006), which in the past had considered fashion trends, sector crowding and market demands as factors limiting the designer&#8217;s creative freedom.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 100;\">Elena Salmi<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court of Justice of the European Union, 18 December 2025\u00a0 Is personalizing components of pre-existing models sufficient to obtain &#8220;Community design&#8221; protection under Regulation (EC) No. 6\/2002, or is it necessary to demonstrate a creative contribution of the designer? With its recent judgment in Case C-323\/24, the Court of Justice of the European Union has&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-categorizzato"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user&#039;s perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer&#039;s freedom.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user&#039;s perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer&#039;s freedom.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"GR legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aurelio@grlegal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aurelio@grlegal\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aurelio@grlegal\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/d35aca97a520045baf185f4aeb0906b4\"},\"headline\":\"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\"},\"wordCount\":341,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Non categorizzato\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00\",\"description\":\"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user's perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer's freedom.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/\",\"name\":\"GR legal\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"GR legal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/app\/uploads\/2025\/10\/favicon.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/app\/uploads\/2025\/10\/favicon.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"GR legal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/d35aca97a520045baf185f4aeb0906b4\",\"name\":\"Aurelio@grlegal\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal","description":"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user's perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer's freedom.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal","og_description":"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user's perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer's freedom.","og_url":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/","og_site_name":"GR legal","article_published_time":"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00","author":"Aurelio@grlegal","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aurelio@grlegal","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/"},"author":{"name":"Aurelio@grlegal","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/d35aca97a520045baf185f4aeb0906b4"},"headline":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design?","datePublished":"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/"},"wordCount":341,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Non categorizzato"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/","url":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/","name":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design? - GR legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-27T09:49:46+00:00","description":"The article analyses a recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union outlining the boundaries of design protection under Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002. The contribution explores the exclusion of the requirement of creativity in favour of the objective criteria of novelty and individual character. Of particular note is the analysis of the influence of fashion trends, examined both in terms of the informed user's perception and, through an innovative approach, the non-limitation of the designer's freedom.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/beyond-creativity-can-catalog-customization-be-eligible-for-protection-as-a-registered-design\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Beyond creativity: can \u201cCatalog Customization\u201d be eligible for protection as a registered design?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/","name":"GR legal","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#organization","name":"GR legal","url":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/app\/uploads\/2025\/10\/favicon.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/app\/uploads\/2025\/10\/favicon.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"GR legal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/d35aca97a520045baf185f4aeb0906b4","name":"Aurelio@grlegal"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=706"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":723,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/706\/revisions\/723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grlegal.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}